issue1

This study was conducted with the objective of predicting and comparing expected gains for two selection indices and to aid identification of a better index to improve maize populations for a target environment, in this case, small-farm conditions. Data from S₂ lines from each of three populations evaluated at three locations in 1988 were subjected to (a) an index that uses economic weights and (b) rank summation index (RSI) that is both weight and parameter free. Responses to single trait selections were much higher than using an index. RSI was considered a better index because it was operationally more efficient and simpler. Selection through RSI will in addition to improving the aggregate trait in the desired direction, improve grain yield and will not increase height much.

Article Purchasing

If you would like to buy just this specific document (article, review or this journal issue), thus take contact with the Editorial Office.

Please specify the title of the article or review, issue, number and volume.

Software and compilation © 2002 Science & Technology. All rights reserved.
Your use of this service is governed by Terms and Conditions. Please review our copyright Policy for details on how we protect information that you supply.

Note to Users

The section "Articles in Press" contains peer reviewed and accepted articles to be published in the print and/or online journal.

The requested document is freely available only to registered users with an online subscription to Food, Agriculture & Environment. If you have set up a personal subscription to this title please enter your user name and password.

Expected responses to aggregate trait selection in maize (Zea mays L.)

Abstract

Article Purchasing

Note to Users