Sensitivity of upland arthropod diversity to livestock grazing, vegetation structure and landform
Author:
Peter Dennis
Received 13 January 2003, accepted 30 April 2003.
Abstract
Livestock production extends
to most non-forested, marginal, upland habitats of Britain. Of these,
indigenous grasslands are stocked predominantly by sheep, stocking densities
having increased in Scotland by 25% between 1975 and 1990. Conversely,
the national herd of cattle in Scotland declined by 22% over the same
period. The effects of grazing management on arthropod distribution and
abundance is reviewed, with particular emphasis on the results of grazing
experiments that have investigated the effects on arthropods of varied
livestock species and stocking rates. Arthropods contribute the most species
of any taxa in the uplands and are critical in upland food chains. The
direction and magnitude of the response of different arthropod taxa to
grazing management reflects their trophic level, life history, size and
mobility, e.g., 30 % of ground and rove beetle species are more sensitive
to landform than grazing management. For the arthropod taxa that are sensitive
to grazing management, the effects are generally indirect, via changes
in the heterogeneity of botanical composition and vegetation structure.
A mosaic of contrasting botanical composition and structural heterogeneity
is essential to conserve and enhance arthropod and broader wildlife diversity
in the uplands. However, the landscape-scale study of mammalian herbivore-vegetation-arthropod
interactions is required both to quantify the relative importance of land
use (grazing management) and landform (landscape physiognomy) across the
uplands and to determine the optimal grain-size of the habitat mosaic
to sustain biodiversity.
| Key words:
Livestock production, sheep grazing, cattle grazing, indigenous grasslands, upland, biodiversity, insect diversity and spider diversity. |
| [FULL
text for subscribers] |
Journal: Food, Agriculture & Environment (JFAE)
Online ISSN: 1459-0263
Year: 2003, Vol. 1, Issue 2, pages 301-307.
Publisher: WFL |
Article
Purchasing
If you would like to buy just this specific document
(article, review or this journal issue) contact
us.
Please specify the title of the article or review,
issue, number and volume.
Software and compilation © 2002 Science
& Technology. All rights reserved.
Your use of this service is governed by Terms
and Conditions. Please review our copyright
Policy for details on how we protect information that you supply.
Note
to Users
The section "Articles in Press" contains peer
reviewed and accepted articles to be published in the print and/or online
journal.
The requested document is freely available only
to registered users with an online subscription to Food, Agriculture
& Environment. If you have set up a personal subscription to this
title please enter your user name and password.
Copyright © 2002 Published by WFL Publisher/World
Food Rd Oy. All rights reserved.
Contact us:
© Meri-Rastilantie 3 B, FIN-00980 Helsinki,
Finland
Tel/fax: +358 9 75 92 775.
|